Prediction of Carolin Babcock vs Marjorie Gladman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Babcock vs M. Gladman

Carolin Babcock

USA

1

Win

Played

3

Win

113

Age

117

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Marjorie Gladman

USA

1

Win

Played

3

Win

113

Age

117

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Babcock 1 - 3 Gladman

They have played 10 sets in total, with Carolin Babcock winning 2 and Marjorie Gladman winning 8. The last match between Carolin Babcock and Marjorie Gladman was at the East Hampton, 29-07-1935, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Carolin Babcock getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Babcock	1
Gladman	3

Last 5 H2H Matches:

() East Hampton(07-29-35)

Stats

Carolin Babcock

Marjorie Gladman

() Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-16-32)

Stats

Marjorie Gladman

Carolin Babcock

() Los Angeles SoCal Chps(05-10-30)

Stats

Marjorie Gladman

Carolin Babcock

C. Babcock vs M. Gladman H2H Profile

C. Babcock	Stats	M. Gladman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
68.44% (167-77)	Career Total W/L	72.18% (384-148)
1	Grass	1
0	Hard	2
1	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Babcock vs M. Gladman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carolin Babcock has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carolin Babcock, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carolin Babcock has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marjorie Gladman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carolin Babcock has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marjorie Gladman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carolin Babcock has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 74% (W/L 14/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 4/3). Marjorie Gladman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 74% (W/L 68/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 192/91).
Player level: In the last year, Carolin Babcock has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marjorie Gladman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Carolin Babcock winning 1 times and Marjorie Gladman being victorious 4 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Carolin Babcock winning 2 and Marjorie Gladman winning 8.
The last match between Carolin Babcock and Marjorie Gladman was at the East Hampton, 29-07-1935, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Carolin Babcock getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carolin Babcock has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marjorie Gladman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carolin Babcock has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marjorie Gladman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carolin Babcock has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marjorie Gladman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carolin Babcock vs Marjorie Gladman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Babcock vs M. Gladman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Babcock	Stats	M. Gladman
1	H2H Matches Won	4
2	Sets Won	8
29	Games Won	50
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
20% (1/5)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	80% (4/5)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (4/4)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Babcock Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Seabright - 27-07-1944
Doris HartD. Hart	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R4 Eleanor PurdyE. Purdy	W	6-4 1-6 6-2	Stats
Seabright - 22-07-1940
R4 Helen BernhardH. Bernhard	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
R3 Margaret Osborne DupontM. Osborne	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 14-08-1938
R3 Sissy MaddenS. Madden	W	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Gladman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Melbourne Hard - 05-06-1961
Ann JenkinsA. Jenkins	L	3-6 6-4 8-6	Stats
Melbourne - 24-11-1960
R3 Jan LehaneJ. Lehane	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 23-11-1959
R2 Judy TegartJ. Tegart	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
South Orange - 01-08-1955
R2 Janet HoppsJ. Hopps	L	W/O	Stats
Haverford - 18-07-1955
R3 Karol FagerosK. Fageros	W	6-3 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Babcock vs M. Gladman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Babcock	Stats	M. Gladman
68.44% (167/77)	YTD Win/Loss	72.18% (384/148)
67.06% (340/167)	Sets Win/Loss	69.55% (797/349)
59.08% (2594/1797)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (6061/0)
69.79% (67/29)	Hard Win/Loss	75.00% (75/25)
57.14% (4/3)	Clay Win/Loss	68.63% (35/16)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	73.68% (14/5)
67.21% (82/40)	Grass Win/Loss	67.84% (192/91)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
68.57% (24/11)	Slam W/L	55.32% (26/21)
33.33% (1/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
70% (160/230)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	73% (374/515)
57% (25/44)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (66/114)
93% (156/145)	1st Set Won, Won Match	93% (369/344)
6% (156/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (369/24)
20% (76/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (147/30)